By judgment no. 597/2026 of 22 September 2026, the Court of Macerata fully dismissed the pleadings advanced by a guarantor against a securitisation special purpose vehicle, assisted by Cassinelli Studio
By judgment no. 2154/2026 of 14 September 2026, the Court of Potenza fully dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by the principal debtor company and by three guarantors,
By judgment no. 435/2026 of 20 July 2026, the Court of La Spezia fully dismissed the objection to enforcement notice brought by a debtor company, upholding the entitlement to the
By judgment no. 1654/2026 of 26 May 2026, the Court of Appeal of Milan, first civil division, upheld the dismissal of the appeal brought by six guarantors against the judgment
By judgment no. 1376/2026 of 24 May 2026, the Court of Cagliari dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by a guarantor, upholding the order issued in favour of
By judgment no. 597/2026 of 22 September 2026, the Court of Macerata fully dismissed the pleadings advanced by a guarantor against a securitisation sp
By judgment no. 2154/2026 of 14 September 2026, the Court of Potenza fully dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by the principal debtor
By judgment no. 435/2026 of 20 July 2026, the Court of La Spezia fully dismissed the objection to enforcement notice brought by a debtor company, upho
By judgment no. 1654/2026 of 26 May 2026, the Court of Appeal of Milan, first civil division, upheld the dismissal of the appeal brought by six guaran
By judgment no. 1376/2026 of 24 May 2026, the Court of Cagliari dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by a guarantor, upholding the order
By judgment no. 306/2026 of 12 May 2026, the Court of Lucca declared inadmissible the late objection under Article 650 of the Italian Code of Civil Pr
By judgment no. 2274 of 8 May 2026, the Court of Genoa, Specialist Business Division, sitting as a panel, fully dismissed the claims – both principa
By judgment no. 389/2026 of 5 May 2026, the Court of Pavia dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by two guarantors for the amount of EUR
By order no. 2331/2026 of 8 April 2026, the Court of Viterbo, sitting as a panel, granted the challenge to the schedule of liabilities brought by a se
By judgment no. 1312/2026 of 3 April 2026, the Court of Lecce, sitting as a single judge, granted the claim brought by a financial company, assisted b
By judgment no. 1997/2026 of 30 March 2026, the Court of Bari dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by a guarantor for the amount of EUR
By judgment no. 683/2026 of 30 March 2026, the Court of Monza fully dismissed the objection to a payment order brought by two guarantors, upholding th
By judgment no. 340/2026 dated 27 March 2026, the Court of Busto Arsizio upheld an ordinary avoidance action brought by a securitisation vehicle, repr
By judgment no. 1028/2026 of 26 March 2026, the Court of Catanzaro dismissed the enforcement objection brought by the debtor subject to enforcement, r
By judgment no. 1327/2026 dated 16 February 2026, the Court of Milan – Specialised Business Section – dismissed a claim for the nullity of a bank
With judgment no. 237/2026, published on 22 January 2026, the Court of Genoa fully upheld the arguments advanced by Cassinelli Studio Legale on behalf
By decree no. 120/2026 dated 9 January 2026, the Court of Cosenza upheld the opposition filed by a special purpose vehicle in insolvency proceedings,
With judgment no. 1/2026, published on 7 January 2026, the Genoa Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal lodged by an account holder who had taken out th
By decree no. 1003/2025 dated 1 December 2025, the Court of Lamezia Terme rejected the urgent application filed in the context of opposition to paymen
By judgment no. 2526/2025, published on 18 November 2025, the Court of Genoa – upholding the arguments put forward by Cassinelli Studio Legale on be
By order no. 130/2025 of 11 November 2025, the Court of Tivoli upheld the appeal brought by a special‑purpose vehicle against the suspension of enfo
By judgment no. 2449/2025, published on 7 November 2025, the Court of Genoa dismissed the opposition brought by several guarantors in complex proceedi
By judgment no. 2442/2025, published on 6 November 2025, the Court of Genoa decided a case concerning several personal guarantees, drawing a distincti
By judgment no. 1199/2025 of 6 November 2025, the Court of Appeal of Genoa fully overturned the first‑instance decision which had denied the existen
By judgment no. 614/2025, published on 28 October 2025, the Court of Savona dismissed the claims brought by two debtors in proceedings concerning a lo
In order to be released from the guarantee provided, the guarantor who raises the nullity of the clause derogating from Article 1957 of the Civil Code
[Court of La Spezia, Judgment No. 499/2025 of 9.10.2025] The Court of La Spezia, in proceedings under Article 281-decies of the Code of Civil Procedur
With Order No. 3272/2025, the First Civil Division of the Supreme Court of Cassation fully upheld the appellate decision that had accepted the defence
[Court of Genoa, Judgment No. 2263/2025 of 8.10.2025] Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully represented a leading leasing company before the Court of
The Court of Appeal of Genoa rejected both the principal and incidental appeals brought against the judgment of the Tribunal of the Ligurian capital,
“A judgment is not lacking in reasoning if it adopts, by reference, the conclusions and key sections of a court-appointed expert report, expressly e
Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully assisted a securitisation company by filing a petition pursuant to Article 281-decies of the Civil Procedure Cod
«The Court of Cassation has recently reaffirmed that a finding of nullity requires that all factual circumstances necessary to establish it must emer
The Court of Velletri has rejected an opposition to a payment order filed by individuals who, claiming to be consumers, alleged violations of consumer
“The submission of a claim for admission in bankruptcy proceedings, equivalent to a judicial claim, results, pursuant to Article 2945, paragraph
Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully represented a leading financial company before the Court of Genoa. Fully endorsing the arguments put forward by
Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully represented a leading in-house company responsible for granting public contributions and funding before the Regi
Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully assisted a leading Italian securitization vehicle company in an appeal proceeding before the Panel of the Catanz
A five-generation-long professional history has a new home. Cassinelli Studio Legale moves its offices from the historic Genoese headquarters in Via B
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted a major Italian company in negotiating a sponsorship contract for the Italian Pavilion at Expo Osaka 2025. The spons
Cassinelli Studio Legale successfully assisted one of the main Italian banking groups in relation to the homologation procedure of a minor agreement b
“In terms of a bank loan, at a fixed rate, with instalment repayment of the loan regulated by a fixed-term instalment amortisation plan of a traditi
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted a leading Italian banking group in the transaction with an SGR, an investment fund management company, an underwrite
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted the buyers of a company active in the management of health residences in Liguria in a dispute arising from urban irr
According to the Court of Appeal of Milan, “the simple proposition of an extrajudicial request for payment must be considered sufficient to avoid fo
With a judgment of 18 November 2024, the Court of Appeal of L’Aquila, reiterated that “in the context of antitrust actions in the field of omnibus
“In the event of a bulk sale of the receivables by a bank pursuant to article 58 of Italian Legislative Decree no. 385 of 1993, the production of th
Article 1923 of the Italian Civil Code “prohibits the insurer from bringing an enforcement or precautionary action against the sums due to the polic
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted a leading Genoese industry in the negotiation of a contract for the exclusive distribution of its products in the te
The intervention in the executive procedure is an act interrupting the prescription. This is one of the principles confirmed by the Court of Genoa in
A creditor who obtained an injunction (which has become final due to lack of opposition) is allowed to separately propose a new request for condemnati
Cassinelli Studio Legale followed the delicate and complex negotiation of a commercial lease contract for a prestigious building in the centre of Geno
As part of the review and reorganisation of its internal procedures, a leading Ligurian company, active in the production of paints for superyachts, e
“It is reiterated, indeed, that the use of this scheme is not prohibited tout court, but only in the event that it constitutes the result of an upst
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted two former statutory auditors of a joint stock company active in the construction sector in relation to a liability
The Court of Pisa rejected the complex opposition to the execution, entrusted with ten reasons, proposed against a securitisation vehicle, assisted by
“Liability for the debts of the demerged company, provided for in Articles 2506-bis, paragraph 2 and 2506-quater, paragraph 3, of the Italian Civil
The college of the bankruptcy section of the Court of Genoa rejected a claim proposed against a securitisation company (assignee of a credit deriving
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted the partners of a start-up active in the field of technological research in the surgical sector, in a complex transa
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted the sellers of a strategic consulting company, with a vertical focus on artificial intelligence, in the sale of 100%
Cassinelli Studio Legale assisted a Monegasque entrepreneur, buyer of one of the most important villas on the eastern Ligurian Riviera. The property h