The intervention in the executive procedure is an act interrupting the prescription. This is one of the principles confirmed by the Court of Genoa in its judgment of 07\/10\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The dispute originates from a deed of obligation on mortgage and injunction notified by a securitisation company to the main debtor company and its guarantor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The securitisation company called into question the transferor bank, the original creditor, which was brought to court under the auspices of Cassinelli Studio Legale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
At the outcome of the trial, the Court of Genoa rejected the proposed opposition, acknowledging that \u201cthe value and importance of the defensive activity carried out by the original defendant and the third party called is different, since that of the Bank is preponderant with respect to that of the securitisation company<\/em>\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Bank was assisted by Roberto Cassinelli together with Nicola Cassinelli and Francesca Minelli.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The intervention in the executive procedure is an act interrupting the prescription. This is one of the principles confirmed by the Court of Genoa in its judgment of 07\/10\/2024. The dispute originates from a deed of obligation on mortgage and injunction notified by a securitisation company to the main debtor company and its guarantor. The securitisation company called into question the transferor bank, the original… <\/p>\n