{"id":11584,"date":"2024-11-19T18:45:30","date_gmt":"2024-11-19T17:45:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/?p=11584"},"modified":"2025-02-18T11:02:35","modified_gmt":"2025-02-18T10:02:35","slug":"fideiussione-omnibus-e-violazioni-antitrust-le-cause-follow-on-e-stand-alone-secondo-la-corte-dappello-di-laquila","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/fideiussione-omnibus-e-violazioni-antitrust-le-cause-follow-on-e-stand-alone-secondo-la-corte-dappello-di-laquila\/","title":{"rendered":"Omnibus surety and antitrust violations: the \u201cfollow-on\u201d and \u201cstand-alone\u201d cases according to the Court of Appeal of L\u2019Aquila"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With a judgment of 18 November 2024, the Court of Appeal of L\u2019Aquila, reiterated that \u201c<em>in the context of antitrust actions in the field of omnibus sureties, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the cases (so-called \u201cfollow-on\u201d cases) concerning the nullity of the omnibus surety contracts prior to measure no. 55 of 2 May 2005 of the Bank of Italy and the cases (so-called \u201cstand alone\u201d cases) concerning omnibus surety contracts signed after said measure\u201d. In the \u201cfollow-on\u201d cases \u2013 as has emerged from several rulings \u2013 it can be used as privileged evidence, in relation to the existence of the antitrust offence ascertained, of the measure no. 55\/2005 taken by the Bank of Italy (where produced), while in the \u201cstand alone\u201d cases, such as that object of this judgment, in application of the general rule referred to in Article 2697 of the Italian Civil Code, the plaintiff is burdened with the allegation and demonstration of all the constituent elements of the case, including that of the very existence of an unlawful agreement at the time of signing the contested contracts\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For these reasons, the Court of Abruzzo rejected the appeal proposed by a real estate company against a bank servicing company, assisted by Cassinelli Studio Legale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The client was assisted by Roberto Cassinelli with Nicola Cassinelli and Vittorio Bertorello.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With a judgment of 18 November 2024, the Court of Appeal of L\u2019Aquila, reiterated that \u201cin the context of antitrust actions in the field of omnibus sureties, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the cases (so-called \u201cfollow-on\u201d cases) concerning the nullity of the omnibus surety contracts prior to measure no. 55 of 2 May 2005 of the Bank of Italy and the&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"more\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/fideiussione-omnibus-e-violazioni-antitrust-le-cause-follow-on-e-stand-alone-secondo-la-corte-dappello-di-laquila\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11735,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_theme","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,32],"tags":[24,13,12],"class_list":["post-11584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-banking-law","category-npls-e-utps","tag-bertorello","tag-cassinellin","tag-cassinellir","is-cat-link-borders-light is-cat-link-rounded"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11584"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11957,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11584\/revisions\/11957"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11735"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiocassinelli.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}